Exceptional Circumstances in relation to raising Trading Disputes |
Guidance Note |
|
Trading Dispute raised within the applicable Dispute Deadline;
Settlement Error has occurred; and
Materiality meets the £3,000 threshold.
Trading Dispute Type | Dispute Deadline |
General Dispute Deadline | 20th Working Day following the day on which the relevant Settlement Run was carried out. |
Trading Dispute relating to SVA Half Hourly data and processes (SVA Half Hourly Dispute) | 70th Working Day following the carrying out of the Final Reconciliation Run (RF). |
Trading Dispute relating to SVA Non Half Hourly data and processes (SVA Non Half Hourly Dispute) | 70th Working Day following the carrying out of the Final Reconciliation Run (RF) |
Trading Dispute concerning data relating to profile coefficient. | 3rd Working Day following the Settlement Day in which the affected Settlement Period(s) occurred. |
Trading Dispute relating to Market Domain Data. | 2nd Working Day following the Settlement Day in which the affected Settlement Period(s) occurred. |
Indicate on the BSCP11/01 Trading Dispute raising form that there is a claim for the TDC to consider exceptional circumstances; and
Attach a statement (together with supporting evidence), as to why it considers that exceptional circumstances have occurred.
The Raising Party could not have been expected to have detected the error sooner through the information available to it;
The Raising Party or an Affected Party were affected by an error that it had no opportunity to resolve;
The Raising Party or an Affected Party had been proactive in investigating the issue prior to the Trading Dispute being raised;
The Raising Party raised the Trading Dispute at the earliest possible opportunity following the identification of a Settlement Error;
Immediate action has been taken to rectify a fault leading to a Settlement Error once it was identified; or
Significant delays have occurred, which are outside of the control of the Raising Party or an Affected Party, causing the disputed period to miss the valid Dispute Deadline.
The Raising Party or an Affected Party could have identified and corrected the issue earlier than when it was first made known to them;
The Raising Party or an Affected Party were not proactive in investigating the issue prior to the Trading Dispute being raised;
There is a significant delay in the Trading Dispute being raised following the identification of a Settlement Error; or
The Raising Party did not submit a statement.
Intellectual Property Rights, Copyright and Disclaimer The copyright and other intellectual property rights in this document are vested in Elexon or appear with the consent of the copyright owner. These materials are made available for you for the purposes of your participation in the electricity industry. If you have an interest in the electricity industry, you may view, download, copy, distribute, modify, transmit, publish, sell or create derivative works (in whatever format) from this document or in other cases use for personal academic or other non-commercial purposes. All copyright and other proprietary notices contained in the document must be retained on any copy you make. All other rights of the copyright owner not expressly dealt with above are reserved. No representation, warranty or guarantee is made that the information in this document is accurate or complete. While care is taken in the collection and provision of this information, Elexon Limited shall not be liable for any errors, omissions, misstatements or mistakes in any information or damages resulting from the use of this information or action taken in reliance on it. |